Yes there is a perfect workflow, that I’ve refined extensively throughout my experience with stationary scanners and handheld scanners & softwares.Ĥ.) Scan alignments, are the key to the best 3D capture workflow. Any erroneous data that lies outside of said point should be eliminated before the alignment stage and merging stage – this is called the ‘trimming stage’. Every scan should maximize the use of said point. Every capture of data should be focused upon the focal point. ![]() I’ve used the best of the best and have decades of experience, with terabytes of data.ģ.) The ‘capture-focal-point’ is the upmost critical area of concern. Stability is key, and multiple scans is key, and aligning them together is key.Ģ.) The best 3D meshes of objects being captured, are ones that are capable of being aligned and merged together – yes from multiple scans, regardless of popular belief about the whole “handheld scanner thing”. The common ‘dream’ of scanning objects where the scanner is constantly moving around and expected to capture ‘everything’ accurately and patch it all together flawlessly – is a false hope and dream. I’ll try to boil it down very simply here:ġ.) The best 3D capture is always one that is taken from a very stable position – regardless of how motion friendly the implications are, i.e. I have some ideas about this type of technology that are very refined from very extensive experience.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |